When a famous woman performs at the Oscars gala, it is news for her dress, her hairstyle, for winning a prize, for giving it, etc. Surely Scarlett Johansson was as much for her dress as for her modern hairstyle, but it was also for something that was not seen at the gala.
Apparently, just before leaving to present his award, the actress dedicated herself to pumping milk behind the scenes. The moment transcended the press and many mothers, many women, appreciate the gesture.
Why was milk taken out?
Scarlett was a mother in September last year. Her baby is now 5 months old and when she went to the Oscars gala, which is not exactly short, she probably needed to express milk to relieve your breasts a little. Maybe people have interpreted it as having milk taken and then taking it to their child, which may be, but I don't believe (keep it in the fridge, then take it home?).
Be that as it may, the case is that the actress continues to do what many mothers today do: work and try to breastfeed your baby. Well, many do, but many others do not, because there are celebrities who choose to stop breastfeeding when they return to work, probably to avoid moments like hers, to have to express milk before going on stage.
Should it be news?
It's news, but it shouldn't be. What he did is totally normal and so we should see them all. Many mothers, on Twitter, supported what he did, thanked him and showed his admiration. I also appreciate it because it is a gesture that serves to normalize breastfeeding, although, as I say, it should be daily bread everywhere.
Come on The normal thing should be that every woman could pump her milk anywhere (Well, not everyone, it is understood) without anyone thinking that he is doing well or doing wrong. But for now it is not like that. It seems that the normal thing, still, is that when a famous woman returns to work her baby is fed only with artificial milk.
